As someone who has fought for years in my own small ways for freedom, I
have been accused of many negative things. Because I believe in the
right of rich people who come by their wealth honestly to enjoy all the
benefits of their money, I have been attacked as an elitist. Because I
believe in the sanctity of private property, I have been told I don't
"care" about education when I oppose yet another school bond vote or
"optional" sales tax. Because I believe in personal responsibility, I
have been charged with heartlessness given my disagreement with welfare
whether in the form of AFDC or food stamps or Medicaid.
These and other positions have led various critics to brand me as an
enemy of "the little guy."
Heaven knows, I enjoy no shortage of adversaries.
Many professional politicians have made their careers embracing "the
little guy." Some wear their "compassion" on their sleeves, elbowing
each other aside as they race towards the microphones and television
cameras to prove to any and all that they "feel" the pain of "the
little guy," that they "care" more than their rivals do about that
neglected victim's plight.
Others wear the "populist" label, decrying all the low-end jobs being
"exported" to other countries. These righteous individuals just know
that a major part of the unemployment problem results from our
sieve-like borders. If only we could keep out all those damned
foreigners, the Second Dawning of America would draw nigh.
A significant number of the defenders of "the little guy" wax indignant
at the evils of Corporate America. They are convinced that the only
thing of interest to the CEO's of Big Business is increasing their
companies' bottom lines: "people before profits" is the mantra chanted
by these protesting, tenderhearted activists.
An exemplar of what awaits "the little guy" should his self-proclaimed
supporters prevail occurred at a recent World Trade Organization (WTO)
meeting in Cancun, Mexico. With confident assurance, these proponents
of policies advancing the cause of "the little guy" told the world that
they sought to uphold the vision of those admirable leaders, Karl Marx,
Vladimir Lenin, and Mao Zedong. This remarkable triumvirate "'represent
the social justice movement, and they did a lot of good things for
people.'" Exemplars of "freedom," these three icons "battled the
exploitation of the common man." People not power or money
motivated these guardians to retain power for "the masses, not...a
certain handful of people." (Quotes from [2].)
Capitalism is the enemy of the "developing world," and the source of
"misery, poverty" and "destruction." Better for the inhabitants of
Africa to avoid luxuries such as "running water and electricity" than
to suffer under the yoke of "colonization and colonialism." Not only is
trade negative for people, it also represents an assault on "plants and
animals" and on the earth, itself. [2] Indeed, the very prospect of
allowing "unsafe," even "deadly," genetically-modified and -enhanced
food to enter into the markets of Third World countries is sufficient
to send many into apoplexy. [1]
These enlightened individuals are joined in decrying commerce by
conservatives who see trade as weakening "U.S. sovereignty and economic
independence." Better, they think, to place stiff tariffs on any goods
imported into this country. [2]
When the most recent WTO talks ended, those who laud the dead
torchbearers of communism called it a "victory for the working poor,
family farmers, farm workers, the indigenous, the poor, and for
immigrants all over the world." They brushed off complaints by some
such as author Paul Driessen that those deceased heroes murdered tens
of millions of their own citizens and kept those who survived destitute
and miserable. [2]
The representatives of "rich" nations, however, were unhappy. One U. S.
House Representative, Charles Stenholm, said this setback delayed the
day when farmers would "give up subsidies" and rely more upon the
"market than...government." Others said they wanted to lower tariffs
and other barriers to trade. [3]
Others disagreed with such goals, maintaining that keeping American
subsidies is better than giving "charity" to the rest of the world. The
prospect of permitting poorer nations to postpone tariff reductions did
not set well with some, either. [3]
Sadly, it is precisely "the little guy" who is getting screwed in this
struggle. Yes, it is wonderful for a politician to back a loosening of
the ropes strangling world trade. Such a stance is less than
believable, however, when the American political machine continues
agricultural policies begun in the Depression that increase food prices
for U.S. consumers while simultaneously undercutting the ability of
farmers in poor countries to compete against American products dumped
into their markets.
How can we take seriously an administration that preaches "free trade"
while imposing tariffs on foreign steel that "save" less than
two-thousand jobs (at nearly $800,000 per) in that industry while
losing a far greater number of employees (about forty-five thousand)
dependent on steel for their own livelihoods? [4]
Where is the sense in a mindset that cloaks itself in empathy for
single-mothers while jacking up their living expenses and imposing
walls of licensing and permits and regulations they must scale before
they can create and run their own businesses?
When will people recognize that asking the State to usurp the world of
medical care will not guarantee lower prices, improved treatment,
accelerated innovation, or greater accessibility to the disadvantaged?
Who in his right head could believe that inflating away the modest
savings of the "working poor" (as though the "rich" do not work...) and
depressing their retirement income possibilities is a better course to
follow than encouraging individual responsibility and decision-making?
What will it take to shake clear the intellectual cobwebs that obscure
the vision of those who claim that tyrants are good for the average
citizen; that poverty, disease, primitive living conditions, and lack
of even the most modest luxuries form an existence worthy to be
pursued; that dying in the desert while seeking a crappy job in America
serves the illegal indigent right?
Why do so many of "the little guys" swallow the poison that freedom is
their enemy and slavery their savior; that they are being "exploited"
when offered a job; that the same desire they have to make more
money is golden as "wages" but evil when it occurs in the form of
"profits"; that a collectivism that extolls the "masses" means that he
as an individual will prosper; that all the political posturing
designed to succor him will, instead, benefit those who know that poor
people are their meal tickets to a comfortable life?
While I do often praise the extremely productive, the exceptionally
creative, the extraordinarily hardworking, I do so knowing that
short of total tyranny that rare group will usually manage to
prosper, even if at reduced levels. Their very personal qualities help
ensure that they can and will maneuver through or jump around or over
most of the roadblocks placed in their path.
It's the average person, however, the mediocre, the less bright, the
less skilled or educated who will stumble or surrender or wander
bewildered when confronted with a twisting maze of laws or a thick
tangle of red tape they neither comprehend nor can navigate.
You don't help the crippled by tossing rocks at their feet. You don't
aid the weak by stacking weights upon their bowed backs. You don't
console the frightened by perpetually scaring them to death with dire
predictions of disaster and calamity they are told they cannot possibly
handle.
Only those with the courage and the integrity to battle for liberty
for the removal of the chains binding our arms only these uncommon
souls deserve the title of "Champion of the Common Man."
Maybe someday "the little guy" will figure that out, too.
References
[1] Morano, Marc. "Mexican Village Plays Host to Fight Over Genetically
Modified Food." CNSNews.com. 9-15-03.
here
[2] Morano, Marc. "WTO Protesters Praise Marx, Lenin, Mao as 'Freedom
Fighters.'" CNSNews.com. 9-15-03.
here
[3] Scott, Alwyn. "WTO talks shatter amid clash of rich, poor nations."
The Seattle Times 9-15-03.
here
[4] Williams, Walter. "Economic Stupidity." WorldNetDaily 4-30-03.
here
See Russ Madden's articles, short stories,
novel excerpts, and items of interest to Objectivists,
libertarians, and sci-fi fans at
http://home.earthlink.net/~rdmadden/webdocs/.
-30-
from The Laissez
Faire Electronic Times, Vol 2, No 37, September 22,
2003
Editor: Emile
Zola Publisher: Digital Monetary
Trust
|