The Little Brown Reader

Please edit this and use it as you like to..-my or in your name. Yes, the Lawmakers are accountable to the voters, to the extent of impeachment of the Federal Justices... HELP! need editing. Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion is at stake!

Betrayal of First Amendment....

Restriction on Congress, or many States? Wording in the First Amendment clearly puts the restriction on one Congress (Federal), not on many States..

Supreme Court surely knew that using the word "Congress" in the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers meant the Federal Congress, because there was only one Congress composed of the Senate and the House.

But there were 13 States, and if the Founding Fathers did mean that the States shall make no law ...., they surely would have worded the negative as they did in the 14th Amendment, where they clearly meant the States:
No State shall make or endorse any law..." In the Constitution the word "No State" is used often; Article 1, Section 10:
"No State shall without consent of Congress.." (note many States, one Congress), also:
"No State shall enter into any Treaty..."

According to the Constitution's First Amendment, the Federal UN-elected or other officials do not have the right to dictate to the States about items in the First Amendment, and/or the rest of the Bill of Rights. Isn't that why it is called "The Bill of Rights?"

To interpret the First Amendment correctly would have given every one of the "several States" the choice of Religion. I believe that the Supreme Court seen a total chaos, in commerce, and in many areas, that would follow having many States with different Religions.
So in a first suitable case they, for the good of the Country, purposely misinterpreted the First Amendment? That then brought on multitudes of frivolous lawsuits.
And more importantly is taking our God from the Nation.

Solution--- ? There are many Churches, therefore Separation of Church and State is a must. But there is only one God, our Creator, if we want to keep what He has given us, we must recognize Him..It is up to the Supreme Court to interpret the Bill of Rights correctly, and the Federal and the State Congresses oversee that our Nation will adhere to the Constitution as written by our Honorable Founding Fathers.

If you agree or ? with the points made above, please click on link below, to view the website:
Also the Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson-

http://www.eino1916.com/

Now let us all propagate the truth in this matter.

Sincerely, Eino Salminen

Please edit this and use it as you like to..-my or in your name. Yes, the Lawmakers are accountable to the voters, to the extent of impeachment of the Federal Justices... HELP! need editing. Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion is at stake!

Betrayal of First Amendment....

Restriction on Congress, or many States? Wording in the First Amendment clearly puts the restriction on one Congress (Federal), not on many States..

Supreme Court surely knew that using the word "Congress" in the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers meant the Federal Congress, because there was only one Congress composed of the Senate and the House.

But there were 13 States, and if the Founding Fathers did mean that the States shall make no law ...., they surely would have worded the negative as they did in the 14th Amendment, where they clearly meant the States:
No State shall make or endorse any law..." In the Constitution the word "No State" is used often; Article 1, Section 10:
"No State shall without consent of Congress.." (note many States, one Congress), also:
"No State shall enter into any Treaty..."

According to the Constitution's First Amendment, the Federal UN-elected or other officials do not have the right to dictate to the States about items in the First Amendment, and/or the rest of the Bill of Rights. Isn't that why it is called "The Bill of Rights?"

To interpret the First Amendment correctly would have given every one of the "several States" the choice of Religion. I believe that the Supreme Court seen a total chaos, in commerce, and in many areas, that would follow having many States with different Religions.
So in a first suitable case they, for the good of the Country, purposely misinterpreted the First Amendment? That then brought on multitudes of frivolous lawsuits.
And more importantly is taking our God from the Nation.

Solution--- ? There are many Churches, therefore Separation of Church and State is a must. But there is only one God, our Creator, if we want to keep what He has given us, we must recognize Him..It is up to the Supreme Court to interpret the Bill of Rights correctly, and the Federal and the State Congresses oversee that our Nation will adhere to the Constitution as written by our Honorable Founding Fathers.

If you agree or ? with the points made above, please click on link below, to view the website:
Also the Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson-

http://www.eino1916.com/

Now let us all propagate the truth in this matter.

Sincerely, Eino Salminen

Please edit this and use it as you like to..-my or in your name. Yes, the Lawmakers are accountable to the voters, to the extent of impeachment of the Federal Justices... HELP! need editing. Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion is at stake!

Betrayal of First Amendment....

Restriction on Congress, or many States? Wording in the First Amendment clearly puts the restriction on one Congress (Federal), not on many States..

Supreme Court surely knew that using the word "Congress" in the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers meant the Federal Congress, because there was only one Congress composed of the Senate and the House.

But there were 13 States, and if the Founding Fathers did mean that the States shall make no law ...., they surely would have worded the negative as they did in the 14th Amendment, where they clearly meant the States:
No State shall make or endorse any law..." In the Constitution the word "No State" is used often; Article 1, Section 10:
"No State shall without consent of Congress.." (note many States, one Congress), also:
"No State shall enter into any Treaty..."

According to the Constitution's First Amendment, the Federal UN-elected or other officials do not have the right to dictate to the States about items in the First Amendment, and/or the rest of the Bill of Rights. Isn't that why it is called "The Bill of Rights?"

To interpret the First Amendment correctly would have given every one of the "several States" the choice of Religion. I believe that the Supreme Court seen a total chaos, in commerce, and in many areas, that would follow having many States with different Religions.
So in a first suitable case they, for the good of the Country, purposely misinterpreted the First Amendment? That then brought on multitudes of frivolous lawsuits.
And more importantly is taking our God from the Nation.

Solution--- ? There are many Churches, therefore Separation of Church and State is a must. But there is only one God, our Creator, if we want to keep what He has given us, we must recognize Him..It is up to the Supreme Court to interpret the Bill of Rights correctly, and the Federal and the State Congresses oversee that our Nation will adhere to the Constitution as written by our Honorable Founding Fathers.

If you agree or ? with the points made above, please click on link below, to view the website:
Also the Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson-

http://www.eino1916.com/

Now let us all propagate the truth in this matter.

Sincerely, Eino Salminen